Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architectureThelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About Thelen ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

Public-Private Partnerships
Private Financing of Infrastructure in California: Overview of PPP Opportunities and Challenges

'Material Effect'
U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Proof Needed to Impose False Claims Act Liability on Subcontractors

Got Early Completion
Owner’s Oral Promise to Pay Subcontractor Enforced by Massachusetts Court

Block Claims of Waiver
When Loans Go Bad, Pre-Workout Agreements Allow Lenders to Protect Their Rights While Negotiating

Bankruptcy Code Is No Bar
Bankrupt Sub’s Claim Against General Contractor Is a Non-Core Proceeding and Must Be Arbitrated, U.S. Court Holds

Saves Time
Prequalification in Government Construction Contracts: How It Works, How Disputes Are Resolved

Fabrication, Design Cases
U.S. Court Permits Quantum Meruit Claims for Work Not Controlled by Contract

No Own Work Exclusion
Florida, South Carolina Supreme Courts Hold that Contractors’ CGL Policies Cover Damages Arising from Subs’ Defective Work

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

Cash Balance Plans: Much Ado About Something


August 9, 1999


Back to Industry Newsletters
 

Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP

Employers are converting traditional defined benefit retirement plans to cash balance plans.  Employees are suing.  Reports are appearing in the media.  Congress is considering comprehensive disclosure rules.


What is a cash balance plan?  What is all the fuss about?  Should you be converting your plan?  Why?  How?  When?

In a defined contribution plan, a formula defines the contribution (e.g., 5% of salary). The contribution is made to a plan and an account is established for each participant.  When the participant retires, the account balance (contributions plus earnings) is distributed to the participant.  In a defined benefit plan, a formula defines the benefit (e.g., 50% of final average salary per year for life).  Actuaries determine how much should be contributed in order to provide enough money to pay the benefits.

Defined contribution plans are much easier to understand than the traditional defined benefit plan.  An employee can easily understand a statement that indicates he or she has $100,000 in his or her account, but will be confused by a statement that indicates he or she is entitled to $1,000 per month at age 65.
 

A cash balance plan is a hybrid plan.  It is technically a defined benefit plan, but it looks and feels like a defined contribution plan.  The current value of the benefit is defined in terms of an account balance.  Each year, that hypothetical account balance is adjusted by crediting the account with hypothetical contributions (e.g., 5% of salary) and hypothetical earnings (e.g., 5%).

The principal reason for the fuss is that defined benefit plans generally favor long-term workers, but cash balance plans, like defined contribution plans, generally favor younger workers and short-term workers.  So when a traditional defined benefit plan is converted to a cash balance plan, long-term workers are often hurt.  Cash balance plans can be designed with transition rules so that long-term workers are not hurt, but not all conversions include transition rules.

Many participants complain that employers have not done an adequate job of explaining to their employees how the conversion affects them.  Congress is reacting to employees' confusion and complaints by considering legislation that would require more disclosure, and perhaps even require individual statements.
 

Should you be converting your defined benefit plan?  Conversion makes sense for many employers and for most employees.  All employers who maintain traditional defined benefit plans should be considering the possibility of converting to cash balance plans, particularly if their plan has a substantial surplus.

Many issues need to be considered.  Some of the common issues that arise are: setting the initial balance, the formula for determining contributions, age and service weighting, integration, the earnings rate, participant election of earnings rates, early retirement subsidies, early retirement windows, age discrimination, matching after-tax contributions, and protections for participants close to the age of retirement at the time of conversion.

Conversion is not for everyone.  The conversion process is complicated, expensive and raises litigation risks that are difficult to quantify.  Many employers are better off continuing, freezing or terminating their defined benefit plans.  Many other employers, however, are leading the charge into the cash balance world.  So many, in fact, that these plans are no longer mere novelties.  Some of the largest plans in the country have made the conversion.
 

Each situation is unique.  The cost to the employer and the impact on each different category of employee should be carefully considered.  Effective employee communication is extremely important.  And, of course, the employer will have to comply with the yet-to-be-enacted disclosure rules and meet all of the technicalities of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code, and other legal requirements.
 

If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form.


For more information about the issues covered in this report, please contact David S. Foster in our San Francisco office at 415-369-7020 or at dsfoster@thelen.com or contact your Thelen attorney. For more information about Thelen's Construction and Government Contracts Department, click here.





©1999 Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About Thelen ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us