Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architectureHowrey
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About Howrey ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

Abandoned Contract
Bankruptcy Court Holds Officer Personally Liable for Corporation’s Debt and Refuses to Discharge It

Still Can Comment
Federal Contractors Must Report Top Executive Pay and Subcontract Awards Under New Interim Rule

Contract Ambiguous?
Contractor Prevails on $36 Million in Claims Against L.A., Allowed to Seek More Damages from Jury

Liquidated Damages
Contractor Barred from Asserting Defenses Because It Failed to Submit Formal Claim to Navy

Monitoring Required
New Federal Stormwater Management Rules for Construction Sites: How They Work and How to Cope

$240 Million Fines
U.S. Steps Up Enforcement of Corruption Law Against International Companies, Executives; Whistleblower Bounties Expanded

Risk Created By Others
Subcontractor Held Liable to Workers Injured by Jobsite Hazard that It Did Not Report

Preliminary Injunction
Lender Ordered to Fund Construction Loan for Commercial Project; Green Financing Cited

Delegation to Arbitrator
Narrowed Role for Courts in Deciding Arbitrability Questions Confirmed by U.S. Supreme Court

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

Oregon Court of Appeal Rejects Attack on Award of Light Rail Project Without Competitive Bidding


December 11, 2000


Back to Industry Newsletters
 

(A revised version of this article appears in The Construction Lawyer, Volume 21, No. 1, January 2001, published by the American Bar Association's Forum on the Construction Industry.)


By John W. Ralls
Howrey LLP

Under Oregon Revised Statutes §279.015 (6), a public agency may exempt a contract from competitive bidding by finding "[i]t is unlikely that such exemption will encourage favoritism in the awarding of public contracts or substantially diminish competition for public contracts" and "[t]he awarding of public contracts pursuant to the exemption will result in substantial cost savings to the public contracting agency."

The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District issued a decision exempting from competitive bidding a contract to design and construct a light rail extension to Portland International Airport. Tri-Met then proceeded to award the work to Bechtel Infrastructure. Under the contract, Bechtel not only would design and build the new line but also would provide significant project funding. In return, Bechtel would receive a lump sum of $125 million as well as development rights along one segment of the line.

Associated Builders and Contractors, a trade association for non-union contractors, filed a petition challenging the exemption and the award. The trial court denied the petition. The Oregon Court of Appeal affirmed. Associated Builders and Constructors, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon, 2000 WL 1470135, 2000 Ore. App. Lexis 1679 (Ore. App. 2000).

On appeal, ABC argued that a contracting agency cannot both exempt a public contract from all competitive requirements and find, as the statute requires, that doing so will not reduce competition for that contract. According to ABC, a public agency may exempt a contract from competitive bidding only if it employs an "alternative contracting method" such as design-build. ABC argued that if the public agency desires to use such a method of contracting, it still must engage in a competitive procurement process of some kind.

The court rejected the argument that an agency cannot both exempt the contract and make the finding that the statute requires. The court held Tri-Met's findings to be sufficient because those findings made it clear that no contractor other than Bechtel could have performed the unique terms of the contract. The board found that because of the unique terms of the contract, "Bechtel is necessarily a sole source entity for this contract."

ABC also argued that even if Tri-Met could exempt the general contract from all competitive requirements, it could do so only if it considered the effect that the exemption would have on the subcontractors who would want to work on the project. Before the award, Bechtel advised Tri-Met it would comply with the Heavy and Highway National Agreement between a contractor's association and the AFL-CIO. This national agreement requires that all subcontractors sign the agreement or an appropriate local collective bargaining agreement. ABC argued that award to Bechtel effectively would prevent non-union subcontractors from competing for work on the project. ABC argued that by eliminating non-union contractors, competition for public contracts would be substantially diminished, in violation of the statute. The court rejected this argument on the ground that subcontracts are not "public contracts." Although Bechtel will pay its subcontractors out of funds it receives from Tri-Met, the distinguishing characteristic of a public contract is that the public agency is responsible for paying the contractor.


If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form. If you would like to subscribe to our RSS feeds or learn more about RSS, click here.


For more information about the issues covered in this report, please contact John Ralls in our San Francisco office at 415-848-3362 or at rallsj@howrey.com or contact your Howrey attorney. For more information about Howrey's Construction Practice Group, click here.


Send This Report to a Colleague

Tools to Share, Organize, Comment on Information


©2000 Howrey LLP

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© Howrey LLP
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About Howrey ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us