Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architectureHowrey
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About Howrey ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

Still Can Comment
Federal Contractors Must Report Top Executive Pay and Subcontract Awards Under New Interim Rule

Contract Ambiguous?
Contractor Prevails on $36 Million in Claims Against L.A., Allowed to Seek More Damages from Jury

Liquidated Damages
Contractor Barred from Asserting Defenses Because It Failed to Submit Formal Claim to Navy

Monitoring Required
New Federal Stormwater Management Rules for Construction Sites: How They Work and How to Cope

$240 Million Fines
U.S. Steps Up Enforcement of Corruption Law Against International Companies, Executives; Whistleblower Bounties Expanded

Risk Created By Others
Subcontractor Held Liable to Workers Injured by Jobsite Hazard that It Did Not Report

Preliminary Injunction
Lender Ordered to Fund Construction Loan for Commercial Project; Green Financing Cited

Delegation to Arbitrator
Narrowed Role for Courts in Deciding Arbitrability Questions Confirmed by U.S. Supreme Court

‘Controlling Employer’
General Contractor’s Responsibility for Jobsite Hazards Created by Subs Affirmed by Court, Commission

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

Contractor May Not Be Debarred Without a Due Process Hearing


November 13, 2000


Back to Industry Newsletters
 

(A version of this article appears in the Construction Law Digest, published by the West Group.)


By James E. Acret

Golden Day Schools, Inc., a non-profit corporation, was debarred by the California Department of Education from applying for childcare contracts for three years. Debarment followed audits that were deemed "unacceptable."

At plaintiff's request, a hearing was held in Sacramento to review the order of debarment. A member of the hearing panel was the director of the audits division, which had determined that the audits were "unacceptable." This person served as a member of the tribunal over plaintiff's objection. The panel found that the audits were unacceptable and upheld the order of debarment.

Plaintiff filed a petition for judicial relief that was denied by the trial court. REVERSED. Golden Day Schools, Inc. v. State Department of Education, ___ Cal.App.4th ___, ___ Cal.Rptr.2d ___, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9935 (2000). There was an appearance that the member was biased in favor of the finding of his own department. "Debarment" is a sanction that excludes an entity from doing business with the government and is imposed upon an entity that has engaged in wrongful conduct or has violated the requirements of a public contract. The consequences of debarment (colloquially called "blacklisting") may include a sudden contraction of bank credit, adverse impact on market price of shares of listed stock, critical uneasiness of creditors and loss of face in the business community. In addition, an entity loses the profits from the business denied as a result of debarment.

The 14th Amendment protects "liberty interests," including the right of an individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life and generally to enjoy the privileges recognized as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men. A person facing debarment has a constitutionally protected liberty interest at stake and, therefore, is entitled to procedural due process of law. Debarment cannot be left to administrative improvisation on a case-by-case basis. Considerations of basic fairness require administrative regulations establishing standards for debarment and procedures that include notice of specific charges, opportunity to present evidence and the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses. A fair hearing and a fair tribunal are basic requirements of due process.


If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form. If you would like to subscribe to our RSS feeds or learn more about RSS, click here.


To learn more about Howrey's Construction Practice Group, click here. For more information about books and other legal materials written by James Acret, click here and enter "Acret" in the site search engine. To learn more about topics covered in this article, contact Paul Berning at 415-848-4996 or at paulberning@howrey.com.



Send This Report to a Colleague

Tools to Share, Organize, Comment on Information


©2000 Howrey LLP

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© Howrey LLP
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About Howrey ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us