 |
Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP
Governor
Gray Davis signed Senate Bill 800 on September 20, 2002.
It sets new standards and procedures in California for homeowners
suing to recover damages for construction defects.
SB
800 adds a new Title 7 to the Civil Code. Title 7 defines
standards for new housing construction and provides that
the violation of those standards is the basis for defect
litigation. SB 800 also creates a mandatory pre-litigation
procedure that gives the homebuilder the opportunity to
repair the alleged defects, to mediate or to make a cash
settlement before the homeowner can file an action in court.
Perhaps
the most notable impact to existing law from SB 800 will
be its new statutes of repose. SB 800 specifies new time
limits for filing actions that vary with the type of defect
claimed. These new time limits are noted below. SB 800 also
places limits on the damages that can be recovered in litigation
brought under the statute.
SB
800 is a lengthy, complex piece of legislation that leaves
considerable room for interpretation by the courts. Many
provisions are imprecise. The exceptions created within
the statute for defect actions brought by homeowners "to
enforce a contract or express contractual provision, or
any action for fraud, personal injury or violation of a
statute" have the potential to undermine the effectiveness
of the new statute.
Following
are some of the major provisions of SB 800:
Who
is covered by SB 800:
- SB
800 primarily covers actions brought by homeowners against
builders. (§§895 (f) and 896.) It defines a
"builder" as a builder, developer or original
seller. (§911.) It defines "homeowner"
to include the individual owners of single family homes,
individual unit owners of attached dwellings and common
interest development associations. (§895 (f).) SB
800 also purports to cover actions against subcontractors,
material suppliers, product manufacturers and design professionals.
(§936.)
Types of Housing Covered:
- SB
800 applies to original construction intended to be sold
as individual dwelling units, whether the units are single
family units or attached units. The law does not apply
to condominium conversions. (§§895 (f), 896.)
Limitations on Damages:
- In
general terms SB 800, limits recovery of damages for detached
single-family homes to the lesser of the cost of repair
or the diminution in value of the home caused by the defect.
(§942 (b).)
- Because
SB 800 does not set limits for attached housing, those
damage limits are less clear. However, SB 800 provides
that claims for damages made under its provisions are
limited to the reasonable value of: repairing the defect;
repairing damages caused by the repair effort; repairing
damages caused by the defect; removing and replacing any
improper repair by the builder; reasonable relocation
and storage expenses; lost business income if the home
was used as a principal place of a business licensed to
be operated from the home; reasonable investigative costs;
and other costs or fees recoverable by contract or statute.
(§944.)
Date of Sale Triggers Applicability:
- Applicability
of the statute depends on the date the new unit was sold.
SB 800 applies to the original sale of new residential
units on and after January 1, 2003. (§§911,
938.)
Standards Defining Actionable Defects:
SB
800 gives lengthy definitions, which it calls "standards,"
for the types of defects that it governs. SB 800 purports
to limit the builder's liability to damages for violation
of these standards. (§896.) In order for a homeowner
to make a claim for violation of these standards, it need
only demonstrate that the home does not meet the applicable
standard, subject to the affirmative defenses specified
by the statute (noted below). (§941 (e).) A brief overview
of these standards, in very general terms, follows:
- Water
Issues: Unintended water shall not be allowed to pass
beyond, around or through doors, windows, patio doors,
deck doors, roofs, roofing systems and components, decks,
balconies, exterior stairs, foundations systems, floor
slabs, stucco, siding, framing, retaining walls, other
exterior walls and wall finishes, surfaces, components
and fixtures. (§§896 (a) (1) through (13).)
SB 800 also specifies that plumbing, sewer and utility
lines shall not leak or corrode and that shower and bath
enclosures and ceramic tile countertops and finishes shall
not allow water into the interiors of walls, flooring
systems or other components. (§896 (a) (14) through
(18).)
- Structural
Issues: Components such as foundations, load-bearing
components, slabs and underlying soils shall not contain
significant cracks or significant vertical displacement
and shall not be structurally unsafe. SB 800 also provides
that these same components shall be constructed in material
compliance with building code criteria for earthquake
and wind-load resistances. (§896 (b) (1) through
(4).) These and other defined standards in SB 800, which
are based solely on code compliance or safety issues,
appear to have been created to pull back from the rule
stated in Aas v. Superior Court, 24 Cal.4th 627,
12 P.3d 1125, 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 718 (2002). Aas exempted
builders from tort liability for construction defects
that have not caused physical injury or damage.
- Soils
Issues: Soils and engineered retaining walls shall
not cause damage to the structure built upon the soil
or the engineered retaining wall and shall not cause the
structure to be structurally unsafe. (§896 (c) (1)
and (2).)
- Fire
Protection Issues: Structures shall materially comply
with building codes and other regulations governing fire
protection of the occupants. Electrical and mechanical
systems, fireplaces, chimneys and related components shall
be constructed and installed so as not to cause an unreasonable
risk of fire. (§896 (d) (1) through (3).)
- Electrical,
Sewer and Plumbing Issues: Such systems shall be installed
to operate properly and shall not impair the use of the
structure by its inhabitants. (§896 (e) through (f).)
- Manufactured
Items: SB 800 provides a standard for manufactured
items not otherwise covered. It states that these items,
including windows, doors, roofs, plumbing products and
fixtures, fireplaces, electrical fixtures, HVAC units,
countertops, cabinets, paint and appliances shall be installed
so as not to interfere with the products' useful life.
(§896 (g) (3).) However, SB 800 does not apply to
any action seeking recovery solely for a defect in a manufactured
product located within or adjacent to a structure. (§896
(g) (3) (E).)
- Other
Defined Standards: SB 800 defines standards for heating
and air conditioning, cracks and vertical displacement
in exterior walls and paving, and a long list of smaller
construction components, including irrigation systems
and drainage, untreated wood posts, untreated steel fences,
paints and stains, roofing materials, landscaping systems,
ceramic tile and backing, dryer vents and inter-unit noise
transmission. (§896 (g) (1) through (14).) It also
provides that structures shall be constructed in a manner
so as not to impair the occupants' safety because the
structure contains public health hazards as determined
by an authorized public health officer or agency having
jurisdiction. (§896 (g) (15).)
- Fit
and Finish Items: Although the language in this section
of SB 800 is unclear, it appears to limit the homeowner's
remedies for "fit and finish" claims related
to cabinets, mirrors, flooring, interior and exterior
walls, countertops, paint finishes and trim to a one-year
warranty. Other than the requirement that the builder
provide a one-year warranty for such items, fit and finish
claims do not appear to be actionable under SB 800. (§900.)
- Enhanced
Protection Agreements: SB 800 allows a builder the
option of providing greater protection or longer protection
periods in its contract with the homeowner than defined
by the statute. SB 800 calls such contracts "enhanced
protection agreements." However, the builder may
not, by contract with the homeowner, lower the protections
or standards from those defined in SB 800. (§901.)
Pre-litigation procedure:
SB
800 sets forth a lengthy, detailed and cumbersome procedure
that must be followed before an action is filed against
any party that allegedly contributed to the claimed defects.
(§§910 to 938.) The burden of this procedure falls
largely on the builder, and the time periods are strictly
construed. Some of the major steps in the procedure are:
- Notice
of Claim: The homeowner gives written notice of the
claim to the builder. (§910 (a).)
- Acknowledgement
of Notice: The builder must acknowledge, in writing,
receipt of notice of the homeowner's claim within 14 days
after receiving it. (§913.)
- Inspection:
The builder has 14 days to schedule an inspection of the
housing unit after acknowledging receipt of the notice
of claim. (§916 (a).) If the builder needs a second
inspection, it must request it within three days of the
first inspection and complete it within 40 days of the
initial inspection. (§916 (c).)
- Notice
to Other Responsible Parties: If the builder intends
to hold a subcontractor, design professional, product
manufacturer, material supplier, insurance carrier, warranty
company or service company responsible for contribution,
the builder must notify them in time for them to attend
the initial or second inspection of the unit. (§916
(e).)
- Builder's
Offer: Within 30 days of the initial inspection or
the second inspection, if one is requested, the builder
may offer in writing to repair the alleged defect and
compensate the homeowner for all damages allowed under
the statute. (§917.)
- Homeowner's
Response: Upon receipt of the offer to repair, the
homeowner has 30 days to authorize the builder to proceed
with the repair or to request the names of up to three
alternative contractors for the repair work. (§918.)
- Offer
to Mediate Required: The builder's offer to repair
shall be accompanied by an offer to mediate, if the homeowner
so chooses. If the mediation fails, the homeowner shall
allow the repairs to be performed. (§919.)
- Timing
of Repairs: Any repairs undertaken by the builder
shall be commenced within one of the following time periods:
(a) Within 14 days of the homeowner's acceptance of the
offer to repair; or (b) within 14 days of the homeowner's
selection of an alternative contractor; or (c) within
seven days after mediation (if one occurs); or (d) within
five days of securing a building permit if one is required.
(§921.)
- No
Waiver or Release for Repairs: The builder may not
obtain a release or waiver in exchange for the repair
work performed as part of the prelitigation procedure.
(§926.)
- Cash
Offer Alternative: Nothing in the pre-litigation procedure
prohibits the builder from making only a cash offer to
the homeowner without any offer to repair. The homeowner
may accept the cash offer or reject it and proceed with
the filing of an action. (§929 (a).) The builder
may obtain a "reasonable release" in exchange
for a cash payment. (§929 (b).)
- Builder's
Failure to Comply with Procedure: If a builder fails
to act in accordance with the timeframes mandated in the
pre-litigation procedure, unless extended by mutual agreement
of the parties and confirmed in writing, the homeowner
may proceed with filing the action. (§930 (a).)
- Homeowner's
Failure to Comply with Procedure: If the homeowner
does not comply with the requirements of the pre-litigation
procedure, the builder may bring a motion to stay any
subsequent court action or other proceeding until the
procedural requirements of the statute have been met.
(§930 (b).)
- Evidence
of Repair Efforts Not Inadmissible: Any repair efforts
undertaken by the builder and evidence of both parties'
conduct during the process shall not be considered settlement
communications or offers of settlement and are not inadmissible
evidence on such basis. (§934.) There
are onerous obligations imposed on the builder to provide
extensive notices and documentation to the buyers at the
time of the sale and also if requested by the homeowner
as part of the pre-litigation procedure. (§912 (a)
through (i).)
Statutes of Repose:
In
several places throughout its text, SB 800 sets limitation
periods that vary with the types of defects. Generally these
limitation periods are as follows:
- 10
years after substantial completion of the improvement
(or the date of recordation of a valid notice of completion)
for actions brought pursuant to the statute -- so long
as provisions within the statute do not specify otherwise.
(§941 (a).)
- Five
years from close of escrow for paint and stain applications.
(§896 (g) (10).)
- Four
years after close of escrow for electrical, plumbing and
sewer systems (§896 (e) and (f)); cracks or vertical
displacement of exterior pathways, driveways, hardscape,
sidewalls, sidewalks and patios (§896 (g) (1)); unreasonable
corrosion of steel fences (§896 (g) (9)).
- Two
years from close of escrow for survival of landscape systems
(§896 (g) (12)); dryer ducts (§896 (g) (14));
and untreated wood posts in contact with soil (§896
(g) (8)).
- One
year after original occupancy of the adjacent unit for
inter-unit noise transmissions in attached structures.
(§896 (g) (6).)
- One
year after close of escrow for irrigation systems and
drainage. (§896 (g) (7).)
Code
of Civil Procedure §§337.1 and 337.15 do not apply
to actions brought under SB 800. (§941 (d).) Thus,
there are no distinctions between latent and patent defects
for purposes of measuring the limitations periods created
by SB 800. Also, if the builder elects to repair the defects
as part of the pre-litigation procedure, the applicable
statutes of limitations are tolled for up to 100 days after
the repair is completed. (§927.) Existing statutory
and decisional law regarding the tolling of statutes of
limitation also may apply. (§941 (e).)
Affirmative
Defenses:
SB
800 expressly provides builders with the following affirmative
defenses in response to claimed defects:
- Unforeseen
act of nature, defined to include weather conditions,
earthquakes, war, terrorism or vandalism in excess of
design criteria established by codes, regulations or ordinances
in effect at the time of construction. (§945.5 (a).)
- Homeowner's
unreasonable failure to prevent or minimize damages. (§945.5
(b).)
- Homeowner's
failure to follow the builder's or manufacturer's recommendations
or commonly accepted maintenance obligations. (§945.5
(c).)
- Homeowner's
alteration, wear and tear, misuse, abuse, neglect or use
of the structure for something other than its intended
purpose. (§945.5 (d).)
- Statutes
of limitations or repose that bar the claim. (§945.5
(e).)
- Builder
has obtained a valid release. (§945.5 (f).)
- Builder's
repair was successful in correcting the defect. (§945.5
(g).)
On
balance, builders should recognize that the complexities
of SB 800 require close examination of the text of its various
sections. Due to the bill's length, there are many details
and fine points that are not discussed in this article.
Nonetheless, builders need to be aware of them. Given that
the timetables set forth in the statute are strictly construed,
builders, subcontractors and others would greatly benefit
from becoming familiar with the procedures outlined in SB
800 so they can be prepared in case they receive notice
of homeowner claims made under the statute. Depending on
the date of sale, such claims could begin to arise as early
as January 2003.
If you would like to receive legal reports and updates
more quickly, by e-mail, click
here and fill out the mailing list form.
For more information about the issues covered in this report, please contact Paul Berning in our San Francisco office at 415-369-7229 or at pwberning@thelen.com or contact your Thelen attorney. For more information about Thelen's Construction and Government Contracts Department, click here.

©2002 Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP
|